• +256782610333 | +256775845691
  • support@summitcl.com
  • 4th Floor Block B, Ntinda Complex, Kampala-Uganda

Uganda Airlines

3.2 Human Resource & Administration Committee Evaluation

Only committee members are required to assess the leadership of the Chairperson, Ms. Barbara Namugambe, particularly in guiding strategic HR decisions and enabling high-performance governance.

3.2 HRAC BOARD COMMITTEE CHAIR EVALUATION

Instructions

Evaluate Chair effectiveness. As an HRAC Committee Member, you are required to evaluate the performance of the Chairperson, Barbra Namugambe -- Chairperson, based on leadership, clarity, follow-through, and stewardship of the committee mandate

Rate scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

To be filled by:

  1. Barbra Namugambe -- Chairperson
  2. Abdi Karim Moding Member
  3. Capt. Ebrahim Sadrudin Kisoro Member
Enter Your Personal Details

Full Name*

Full Name*

State your full name, be consistent throughout to help us track your responses

Clear selection

Email Address*

Email Address*

Please enter a valid email

Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
1. Strategic Focus & Agenda Leadership
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

1.1)*

1.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair ensures the committee agenda is well-prioritised, focused on strategic oversight, and aligned with the committee’s mandate.
Clear selection

1.2)*

1.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair guides the committee to provide high-value insights and recommendations that inform Board decision-making.
Clear selection

1.3)*

1.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair ensures committee activities are aligned with the organisation’s strategic objectives, risk appetite, and stakeholder expectations.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
2. Meeting Effectiveness & Process Discipline
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

2.1)*

2.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair runs committee meetings with clarity, discipline, and effectiveness—managing time, participation, and discussion flow.
Clear selection

2.2)*

2.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair ensures all committee members are encouraged to contribute, and no single member dominates discussions.
Clear selection

2.3)*

2.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair accurately summarises discussions, integrates divergent views, and ensures actionable resolutions.
Clear selection

2.4)*

2.4)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair ensures the committee meets regularly as scheduled and in accordance with its Terms of Reference (ToR).
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
3. Oversight, Follow-through & Accountability
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

3.1)*

3.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair diligently tracks the implementation of committee resolutions and provides structured feedback to the full Board.
Clear selection

3.2)*

3.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair ensures the committee receives complete, accurate, and timely information to support evidence-based oversight.
Clear selection

3.3)*

3.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair champions performance reviews and continuous improvement within the committee.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
4. Member Engagement & Capability Development
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

4.1)*

4.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair fosters a collaborative, inclusive, and respectful committee culture.
Clear selection

4.2)*

4.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair ensures that new members are effectively oriented to the committee’s mandate, ToR, and governance expectations.
Clear selection

4.3)*

4.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair supports the continuous development of committee members, encouraging upskilling and engagement with emerging trends
Clear selection

4.4)*

4.4)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair constructively addresses conflicts, fosters consensus, and keeps the committee focused on its oversight role.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
5. Stakeholder Stewardship & External Relations
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

5.1)*

5.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair constructively represents the committee’s views to the full Board with clarity, objectivity, and strategic insight.
Clear selection

5.2)*

5.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair demonstrates an awareness of stakeholder interests and integrates these considerations into committee discussions.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
6. Integrity, Ethics & Governance Values
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

6.1)*

6.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
6.1) The Chair conducts themselves with integrity and professionalism, upholding the organisation’s values and governance standards.
Clear selection

6.2)*

6.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair fosters ethical decision-making and holds the committee to high standards of transparency and accountability.
Clear selection

6.3)*

6.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Chair is accessible and responsive to committee members between meetings, providing guidance and follow-up where necessary.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
7. Overall Effectiveness
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

7.1)*

7.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Overall, the Chair provides clear leadership, strategic oversight, and enhances the effectiveness of the committee.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
Provide any other feedback you may have.

1) What should the Committee Chair continue doing, and why?*

1) What should the Committee Chair continue doing, and why?*

Please highlight specific behaviours, practices, or leadership approaches that have positively impacted the Committee’s performance or dynamics.

Clear selection

2)Top two areas for improvement or change*

2)Top two areas for improvement or change*

Please identify any leadership behaviours, oversight gaps, or process issues that the Chair could strengthen to enhance committee effectiveness.

Clear selection

3) In what ways has the Chair elevated the quality of strategic thinking and oversight within the committee?*

3) In what ways has the Chair elevated the quality of strategic thinking and oversight within the committee?*

Provide examples, if applicable.

Clear selection

4) How effectively does the Chair foster trust, psychological safety, and constructive challenge among members?*

4) How effectively does the Chair foster trust, psychological safety, and constructive challenge among members?*

Does the Chair create an environment where dissenting views are welcomed and valued?

Clear selection

5) How would you describe the Chair’s influence beyond the committee—across the Board and with key stakeholders?*

5) How would you describe the Chair’s influence beyond the committee—across the Board and with key stakeholders?*

Has the Chair positioned the committee as a strategic contributor to the broader governance framework?

Clear selection

6) What advice would you give the Chair as they reflect on their leadership and prepare to mentor the next generation of board leaders?*

6) What advice would you give the Chair as they reflect on their leadership and prepare to mentor the next generation of board leaders?*

Think of this as feedback from one governance leader to another.

Clear selection
Page 1 of 9

Copyright © 2025 Summit Consulting Ltd | Forensics. Advisory. Security | All Rights Reserved.