• +256782610333 | +256775845691
  • support@summitcl.com
  • 4th Floor Block B, Ntinda Complex, Kampala-Uganda

Uganda Airlines

2.2 Human Resource & Administration Committee Evaluation

Consider how effectively the committee oversees people, culture, executive performance, and organizational structure

2.2 HRAC BOARD COMMITTEE EVALUATION

Instructions

All board members are required to evaluate the effectiveness of the HRA Committee. Be objective and support your ratings where necessary.

Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

Enter Your Personal Details

Full Name*

Full Name*

State your full name, be consistent throughout to help us track your responses

Clear selection

Email Address*

Email Address*

Please enter a valid email

Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
1. Committee Mandate & Composition
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

Question*

Question*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
1.1) The Committee’s mandate is clearly defined, relevant, and regularly reviewed to align with strategy, risks, and emerging trends
Clear selection

1. 2)*

1. 2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee is composed of members with the appropriate mix of skills, experience, and independence to fulfil its role.
Clear selection

1.3)*

1.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Members understand the Committee’s purpose, scope, and responsibilities
Clear selection

1.4)*

1.4)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The delegation of authority from the Board to the Committee is clear and appropriate.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
2. Strategic Oversight & Impact
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

2.1)*

2.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee proactively contributes to the organisation’s strategic direction and risk governance.
Clear selection

2.2)*

2.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee demonstrates sound judgement on key issues and supports evidence-based Board decisions.
Clear selection

2.3)*

2.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee effectively identifies matters requiring strategic Board attention.
Clear selection

2.4)*

2.4)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee reviews its performance against objectives and delivers tangible governance value.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
3. Meetings & Decision-Making
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

3.1)*

3.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The frequency of meetings is sufficient to meet the Committee’s responsibilities.
Clear selection

3.2)*

3.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Meetings are well-structured, well-prepared, and conducted with discipline and focus.
Clear selection

3.3)*

3.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
All members are encouraged to contribute and dissenting opinions are respected.
Clear selection

3.4)*

3.4)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Action points are clearly documented, followed up, and progress is reported.
Clear selection

3.5)*

3.5)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Meetings begin and end on time and make efficient use of Directors’ time.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
4. Committee Outputs & Reporting
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

4.1)*

4.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee produces clear, insightful reports and recommendations to the Board in a timely manner.
Clear selection

4.2)*

4.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Committee deliberations are well-documented and resolutions are actionable.
Clear selection

4.3)*

4.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee tracks execution of decisions and follows through on resolutions.
Clear selection

4.3)*

4.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The interaction between the Committee and the Board is constructive and adds value.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
5. Independence, Integrity & Ethics
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

5.1)*

5.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee maintains appropriate independence from management and other Board functions.
Clear selection

5.2)*

5.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee upholds high standards of ethical conduct and confidentiality.
Clear selection

5.3)*

5.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Potential conflicts of interest are identified, disclosed, and managed appropriately.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
6. Management Interface & Information Flow
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

6.1)*

6.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee receives high-quality, timely information to inform decisions.
Clear selection

6.2)*

6.2)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
Management responds promptly to Committee requests for information or action.
Clear selection

6.3)*

6.3)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee constructively challenges management and maintains respectful dialogue.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
7. Overall Committee Performance
Rating scale

5 – Outstanding| 4 –Exceeds expectations | 3 – Meets exectations | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory

7.1)*

7.1)*

Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Meets expectations
Exceeds expectations
Outstanding
The Committee demonstrates value-adding oversight and operates as a high-performance governance body.
Clear selection
Page 1 of 9
Open feedback section.

1. What should this Committee continue doing to maintain effectiveness?*

1. What should this Committee continue doing to maintain effectiveness?*

Clear selection

2. What two areas could the Committee improve or do differently for greater impact?*

2. What two areas could the Committee improve or do differently for greater impact?*

Please identify any leadership behaviours, oversight gaps, or process issues that the Chair could strengthen to enhance committee effectiveness.

Clear selection

3. What has this Committee contributed to strategic decision-making during the past term?*

3. What has this Committee contributed to strategic decision-making during the past term?*

Provide examples, if applicable.

Clear selection

4. Additional feedback or reflections on Committee performance:*

4. Additional feedback or reflections on Committee performance:*

Does the Chair create an environment where dissenting views are welcomed and valued?

Clear selection
Page 1 of 9

Copyright © 2025 Summit Consulting Ltd | Forensics. Advisory. Security | All Rights Reserved.